English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 90429/105609 (86%)
Visitors : 10277962      Online Users : 363
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/101581


    Title: The Contribution of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Genotype to Oral Cancer Susceptibility in Taiwan
    Authors: 孫國丁;Sun, Kuo-Ting;Tsa, Chia-Wen;Tsai, Chia-Wen;Cha, Wen-Shin;Chang, Wen-Shin;Liang-Chun, S;Shih, Liang-Chun;Che, Liang-Yu;Chen, Liang-Yu;Ts, Ming-Hsiu;Tsai, Ming-Hsiu;Ji, Hong-Xue;Ji, Hong-Xue;Hs, Chieh-Lun;Hsiao, Chieh-Lun;包大?;Bau, Da-Tian;*
    Contributors: 生物資訊與醫學工程學系
    Date: 2016-07
    Issue Date: 2016-11-08 10:12:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Aim: Metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of multifunctional proteins which have been shown to be up-regulated in various types of cancer. However, the contribution of MMP1 genotype to oral cancer has not been elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of MMP1 promoter 1607 genotype to the risk of oral cancer. Materials and Methods: In this case–control study, MMP1 genotype and its interaction with consumption of areca, cigarettes, and alcohol in determining oral cancer risk were investigated in 788 patients with oral cancer and 956 gender-matched healthy controls. Results: The distribution of 2G/2G, 1G/2G and 1G/1G for MMP1 promoter 1607 genotype was 36.8%, 40.2% and 23.0% in the oral cancer group and 34.3%, 44.9% and 20.8% in the non-cancer control group, respectively (p for trend=0.1454). We also analyzed the allelic frequency distributions and found that the variant 1G allele of MMP1 promoter 1607 conferred similar oral cancer susceptibility as the wild-type 2G allele (odds ratio=0.99, 95% confidence interval=0.87-1.14, p=0.9199). As for the gene–lifestyle interaction, there was an obvious protective effect of MMP1 promoter 1607 1G/2G genotype on the risk of oral cancer among smokers (odds ratio=0.71, 95% confidence interval=0.55-0.91, p=0.0076), but not non-smokers. There was no interaction between MMP1 promoter 1607 genotype and areca chewing or alcohol drinking habits. Conclusion: The 1G/2G genotype of MMP1 promoter 1607 may have a protective effect on oral cancer risk for smokers. The detailed mechanisms involved in this require further investigation.
    Relation: IN VIVO
    Appears in Collections:[生物資訊與醫學工程學系 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML75View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback