English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 90453/105671 (86%)
Visitors : 15317467      Online Users : 383
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/111694

    Title: Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Balance Computerized Adaptive Test in Patients With Stroke
    Authors: Chiang, Hsin;Chiang, Hsin-Yu;Lu, Wen-Shia;Lu, Wen-Shian;尤菀薈;Yu, Wan-Hui;Hsueh, I-Pin;Hsueh, I-Ping;謝清麟;Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    Contributors: 醫學暨健康學院職能治療學系
    Date: 2018-08
    Issue Date: 2018-12-25 10:51:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Objective
    To examine the interrater and intrarater reliability of the Balance Computerized Adaptive Test (Balance CAT) in patients with chronic stroke having a wide range of balance functions.

    Repeated assessments design (1wk apart).

    Seven teaching hospitals.

    A pooled sample (N=102) including 2 independent groups of outpatients (n=50 for the interrater reliability study; n=52 for the intrarater reliability study) with chronic stroke.

    Not applicable.

    Main Outcome Measures
    Balance CAT.

    For the interrater reliability study, the values of intraclass correlation coefficient, minimal detectable change (MDC), and percentage of MDC (MDC%) for the Balance CAT were .84, 1.90, and 31.0%, respectively. For the intrarater reliability study, the values of intraclass correlation coefficient, MDC, and MDC% ranged from .89 to .91, from 1.14 to 1.26, and from 17.1% to 18.6%, respectively.

    The Balance CAT showed sufficient intrarater reliability in patients with chronic stroke having balance functions ranging from sitting with support to independent walking. Although the Balance CAT may have good interrater reliability, we found substantial random measurement error between different raters. Accordingly, if the Balance CAT is used as an outcome measure in clinical or research settings, same raters are suggested over different time points to ensure reliable assessments.
    Appears in Collections:[職能治療學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback