English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 90453/105672 (86%)
Visitors : 12161318      Online Users : 749
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    ASIA unversity > 醫學暨健康學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 310904400/15870


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/15870


    Title: A Psychometric Analysis of the Chinese Version of Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS): Reliability and Validity.
    Authors: 柯慧貞;jennyko;Huei-Chen Ko;林旻沛;Lin, Min-Pei;陳正嘉;Cheng-Chia Chen;周鉦翔;Cheng-Hsiang Chou;陳廣圻;Kuang-Chi Chen
    Contributors: 心理學系
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2012-11-23 15:03:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 研究目的:本研究旨在修訂中文版多向度完美主義量表,並進行信效度分析;也驗證Frost的六向度完美主義建構與二因素次層結構。根據文獻分析,本研究假設「過度在乎錯誤」、「對行動的懷疑」、「父母批評」及「父母期望」分量表分數,與強迫症狀或憂鬱症狀量尺分數呈低度相關;「個人標準」分量表分數與憂鬱症狀分數及強迫症狀量尺分數呈正相關;而「組織性」分量表分數與憂鬱症狀或強迫症狀分數則無關;並據此進行量表之效標效度分析。研究方法:透過分層叢集取樣,由南區大專校院大學生抽樣有效樣本2,190名;自填中文版多向度完美主義量表、身心健康評估量表。研究結果:全量表內部一致性為.938,分量表內部一致性介於.736~.903,六向度建構及二次層因素建構適配度指標良好,量表與各效標間關係亦支持上述假設。研究結論:中文版多向度完美主義量表具良好之信度、效標關聯效度,並支持Frost的六向度完美主義建構與二因素次層結構模型。

    Purpose: The goals of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS), to examine the six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two second-order factors as proposed by Frost, and to explore the relationships among the six dimensions, two second-order factors, depressive symptoms, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Based on a literature review, the following hypotheses were examined: the subscale scores on "Concern over Mistakes", "Doubting of Action", "Parental Expectation", and "Parental Criticism" had positive relationships with both the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptom scores; the "Personal Standard" subscale score had a weak relationship with the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms scores; the "Organization" subscale score was not correlated with either depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. Methods: Using stratified and cluster sampling, a total of 2,190 college students (mean age=19.718) were recruited from southern Taiwan and administered the CMPS, Ko Depression Inventory, and Symptoms Check List-90-R. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .938 for the CMPS and ranged within between .736 and .903 for the subscales. Moreover, the six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two-second order factors had good model-fit evaluations. In addition, the "Concern over Mistakes", "Doubting of Action", "Parental Expectation", and "Parental Criticism" subscales had positive relationships with the depressive symptom and obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. The "Personal Standard" subscale score had weak relationships with the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms scores. The "Organization" subscale score was not correlated with either depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. Results supported all hypotheses. We also found that males had higher scores than females on "Parental Expectation" and "Doubting of Action". Conclusions: The CMPS is a reliable and valid measurement of perfectionism. Moreover, Frost's six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two second-order structures was supported.
    Relation: 中華心理衛生學刊 / Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 24(1):61-96.
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbUnknown335View/Open


    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback