With the development of information technology and Internet, the criminal codes have changed, so the Internet has become an instrument of crime as a new type of criminal means, which is called cybercrime. There are different implementation techniques between common Internet crime and traditional crime. The judgment based on the evidence for the Internet crime has also changed compared with the traditional crime. The main litigation proceedings taken by the judge between the cybercrime and traditional crime are slightly different. In this paper, we analyzed the common cybercrime by using actual adjudication results in Taiwan, and then generalized the common evidences of cybercrime. Finally, we compared the litigation processes between traditional crime and cybercrime. It is hoped that judicial adjudication for the cybercrime will be more cautious so to prevent the occurrence of misjudgement.