English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 90453/105671 (86%)
Visitors : 16008026      Online Users : 229
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    ASIA unversity > 管理學院 > 經營管理學系  > 期刊論文 >  Item 310904400/79814

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/79814

    Title: Using a QCAC–Entropy–TOPSIS approach to measure quality characteristics and rank improvement priorities for all substandard quality characteristics
    Authors: Ou, Liang-Yuh;Ouyang, Liang-Yuh;Ch, Kune-Suan;Chen, Kune-Suan;Ya, Chun-Ming;Yang, Chun-Ming;許昌賢;Hsu, Chang-Hsien
    Contributors: 經營管理學系
    Keywords: Quality Characteristic Analysis Chart (QCAC);Discrimination Distance (DD);Entropy;Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
    Date: 2014-10
    Issue Date: 2014-06-05 12:13:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: A key issue faced within the manufacturing industry is determining how to measure quality characteristics and prioritise improvements to be made to all substandard quality characteristics of a product with respect to resource requirements and performance improvement potential. This study proposes a QCAC–Entropy–TOPSIS approach in order to address this issue. It combines the Quality Characteristic Analysis Chart (QCAC), entropy method and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The proposed method is not only helpful to measure and determine whether the quality characteristics meet 6σ, 5σ, 4σ or 3σ but also to rank improvements in all substandard quality characteristics of a product in light of resource requirements and potential for performance improvements simultaneously, making it suitable to all manufacturing industries. Moreover, it also can be a powerful tool for analysing the problems that lead to substandard quality characteristics due to poor accuracy and/or precision. Firstly, using the QCAC, the substandard quality characteristics of the product can be determined and the corresponding values of the Discrimination Distance (DD) can then be computed. Subsequently, all the substandard quality characteristics can be regarded as alternatives when conducting entropy and TOPSIS analyses. Secondly, the weights of the evaluation criteria can be calculated by using the entropy method. Lastly, the weights of the evaluation criteria and the values of DD can be substituted into the TOPSIS method. The manufacturer can then categorically prioritise improvement options for all substandard quality characteristics with respect to resource requirements, and consider potential for performance improvements simultaneously. An example is provided for a bicycle quick release manufacturer to illustrate in detail the calculation process of the developed approach. Finally, the advantages of the proposed method are also given through comparisons with Process Capability Analysis Chart and TOPSIS methods.
    Appears in Collections:[經營管理學系 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.

    All items in ASIAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback