ASIA unversity:Item 310904400/79814
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 90570/105786 (86%)
造访人次 : 16306505      在线人数 : 245
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    ASIA unversity > 管理學院 > 經營管理學系  > 期刊論文 >  Item 310904400/79814


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/79814


    题名: Using a QCAC–Entropy–TOPSIS approach to measure quality characteristics and rank improvement priorities for all substandard quality characteristics
    作者: Ou, Liang-Yuh;Ouyang, Liang-Yuh;Ch, Kune-Suan;Chen, Kune-Suan;Ya, Chun-Ming;Yang, Chun-Ming;許昌賢;Hsu, Chang-Hsien
    贡献者: 經營管理學系
    关键词: Quality Characteristic Analysis Chart (QCAC);Discrimination Distance (DD);Entropy;Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
    日期: 2014-10
    上传时间: 2014-06-05 12:13:22 (UTC+8)
    摘要: A key issue faced within the manufacturing industry is determining how to measure quality characteristics and prioritise improvements to be made to all substandard quality characteristics of a product with respect to resource requirements and performance improvement potential. This study proposes a QCAC–Entropy–TOPSIS approach in order to address this issue. It combines the Quality Characteristic Analysis Chart (QCAC), entropy method and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The proposed method is not only helpful to measure and determine whether the quality characteristics meet 6σ, 5σ, 4σ or 3σ but also to rank improvements in all substandard quality characteristics of a product in light of resource requirements and potential for performance improvements simultaneously, making it suitable to all manufacturing industries. Moreover, it also can be a powerful tool for analysing the problems that lead to substandard quality characteristics due to poor accuracy and/or precision. Firstly, using the QCAC, the substandard quality characteristics of the product can be determined and the corresponding values of the Discrimination Distance (DD) can then be computed. Subsequently, all the substandard quality characteristics can be regarded as alternatives when conducting entropy and TOPSIS analyses. Secondly, the weights of the evaluation criteria can be calculated by using the entropy method. Lastly, the weights of the evaluation criteria and the values of DD can be substituted into the TOPSIS method. The manufacturer can then categorically prioritise improvement options for all substandard quality characteristics with respect to resource requirements, and consider potential for performance improvements simultaneously. An example is provided for a bicycle quick release manufacturer to illustrate in detail the calculation process of the developed approach. Finally, the advantages of the proposed method are also given through comparisons with Process Capability Analysis Chart and TOPSIS methods.
    關聯: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH,52(10),3110-3124.
    显示于类别:[經營管理學系 ] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在ASIAIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈